2.4L at 18psi:
http://www.ka-t.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=38282
So your 2L makes 2.4L torque? Where did the 0.4L come from? magic?
cams, exhaust, intake, makes no difference. Displacement is, there is no replacement. It doesn't match what is typical, is all
2L at 18psi again, volkswagon this time
https://www.getunitronic.com/ecu-tun...012-stage1plus
Oh look 325ft*lbs and its not even a dynojet.
Think about that for a minute.
They clearly fudged the numbers up a little to sell their product, and its higher than any other 2L i've ever seen because its NOT a dynojet and was fucked with, and STILL its 30ft*lbs less than what you are suggesting a 2L will make!
Mitsubishi, gasoline, 2L
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...93-octane.html
355ft*lbs of torque... at 27psi of boost!
ur telling me you make what a 2.4L engine makes, that sr20VE makes what a 4g64 makes at 27psi, with just 19psi... it makes the 4g63 engine look like garbage! When we all know 4g63 is king. Or so I heard
Can it be that good? to beat every other engine ever made? Realistically I hope so because I will use it immediately. Can anybody find more graphs?