View Single Post
Old 01-23-2011, 11:16 AM   #1735
Nick_04K
Zilvia Junkie
 
Nick_04K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vernal, UT
Age: 30
Posts: 467
Trader Rating: (0)
Nick_04K is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by simmode1 View Post
Personally, I'd go with +20 all around with 245(f) and 265(r).
Quote:
Originally Posted by simmode1 View Post

Your proposed 17x9's for the front with offset between +17 to +25. Do you realize that my suggested +20 offset falls within that range? Do you also realize than going much higher than +20 in the front won't clear alot coilovers? Do you also realize that many ppl have been running 17x9+20 FN01RC's with 245/40 tires for YEARS now?

From way earlier in the thread: 17x9+20(effective) with 255/40's fronts. Rears are 17x10+25 with 275/40's. Rolled and only slightly pulled.

Does this camber look unneccessary or extreme? Not at all far off from my suggested 17x9+20 with 245/40's and 18x10+20 with 265/35's. His rears are 5mm less flush, but since the tire size I recommended was 10mm narrower and lower profile, should fit about the same.

There is a reason why I gave very specific specs instead vague estimate with wide margins, like you. It's because the sizes I recommended are common to find and have been done before.

And yes, you are a rude ass little kid.
My reply was not only to your offset! But your offset matched with your tire size.

***A 18x10 +20 with a 265 in the rear will NOT put his 2jz power to the ground as effectively as a 265 with a higher offset wheel!***

And good job making up your "purposed" aspect ratios in your new post haha. You never mentioned them earlier. I quoted your original post to refresh your memory.

Sorry you got all butt hurt about me disagreeing with your recommendations and using the super duper offensive f word when i did it.

Oh and by the way..You are just a narrow minded 31 year old ass.
Nick_04K is offline   Reply With Quote