Ka24 n/a vs. Ka24 t/c vs. Sr20 [Archive] - Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

PDA

View Full Version : Ka24 n/a vs. Ka24 t/c vs. Sr20

David16

07-12-2002, 12:15 PM

I really just wanted to see what a poll was so please don't be annoyed by probably the most asked question on here.

Yoshi

07-12-2002, 12:19 PM

There's a whole section for this man.
Expect the flames to be coming shortly from others.

SR20Fastback

07-12-2002, 04:28 PM

I said the SR, but Im really starting to wish I had a dohc low mileage KA to start workin on in the garage (assuming I had room and extra money). Although I do love the CA

240sxtreme

07-12-2002, 06:18 PM

eh...I think as long as it doesn't become a SR vs. KA vs. CA thread...if everyone just states what they would rather have and why...without just stating "cause it's better!"...I don't see why this would turn into a flame war.

for me...I said KA-T...but I'll probably just stay NA and create a high compression (well, streetable high compression) NA. I'm pretty much there, just need cams, cam gears, piston and rods.

ca18guy

07-12-2002, 06:21 PM

I vote CA cause well I have too  <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/hmmm.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':hmmm:'>  But if I was in the states I would probably go and build a ka-t  <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':0'>

MarketPlayer

07-12-2002, 06:59 PM

Sorry my choice isn't up there, but i choose RB20DET b/c i don't have the most steady foot, and the RB is such a smooth accelerator, it won't jerk like the KA does for me!  It can easily be fixed w/ lots of practice but i still want the RB!

hopeful

07-12-2002, 09:30 PM

Ka+T...

Only becuz u already got the engine, and dont need a swap, and higher potential.

SR20Fastback

07-13-2002, 02:57 AM

</span><table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td>Quote (hopeful @ July 12 2002,8:30)</td></tr><tr><td id="QUOTE">Ka+T...

Only becuz u already got the engine, and dont need a swap, and higher potential.</td></tr></table><span id='postcolor'>
Careful what you say now, dont want to start a war.... I say they all have equal potential with the right amount of money  <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/thumbs-up.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':thumbsup:'>

Disturbed240

07-13-2002, 10:32 PM

I voted KA N/A! and I'm the only one to do so, so far.... <img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/huh.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=':huh:'>

boosteds14

07-15-2002, 08:52 AM

i got to support what i bought the car with. dont like wasting money. lol

Bbandit

07-15-2002, 09:19 AM

i dont know why but i got a crush on ca...

shady

07-15-2002, 06:12 PM

n\a nitrious ;>

SaintlyCharBoy

07-17-2002, 01:33 PM

voted KAt
1) the ka is epa tested (though in some areas the aftermarket turbo would make it illegal anyway)
2) there truly is no "replacement for displacement"
3) everybody and his mom has an sr20
4) a well built kat tends to show the owner's / tuner's skills (or $$<img src="http://www.zilvia.net/f/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wink.gif" border="0" valign="absmiddle" alt=';)'> rather than nissan's which already relatively proven
5) a blown KA is dirt cheap and a great place to start