View Single Post
Old 05-13-2008, 08:49 AM   #12
g6civcx
Post Whore!
 
g6civcx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 5,764
Trader Rating: (5)
g6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfectiong6civcx is close to perfection
I don't want to dig it up again, but the big arguments from them was that the skinny and the fatty send a different signal to the ECU, and the ECU gets confused if you mix and match.

My position was that at best the signal is more responsive on one type over the other, but the ECU takes an average of the sensor reading over a period of time, and o2 reading isn't a crucial parameter anyway.

Does anybody want to run some testing?
g6civcx is offline   Reply With Quote