View Single Post
Old 06-29-2018, 01:13 AM   #9
Kingtal0n
Post Whore!
 
Kingtal0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
Age: 41
Posts: 4,828
Trader Rating: (17)
Kingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond reputeKingtal0n has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via AIM to Kingtal0n
Quote:
Originally Posted by brndck View Post
they should let me beta test the larger one. if I can get 500whp on 91 octane, at 18psi, I'd be a happy camper. Hopefully they'll release more info and pricing soon
for fun
It doesn't really matter how much boost once the turbo has enough capacity. It matters how much RPM you spin the engine.

For example say you limited rpm to 6000. Well no matter how much "bigger and better" the turbo gets, even the best turbo in the world at 18psi is not going to touch 500whp with a 2.0L engine.
Ex math,
122x6000/3456 = 211CFM * 0.069 = 14.6lb/min * (2.22) = 320 horsepower without drivetrain losses.


So now lets take a 2.0L engine at 7psi with a "very efficient turbo" except this time we spin the engine to 9,800rpm

122x9800/3456 = 345.9 * .069 = 23.87lb/min * 1.5 = 358bhp

So less boost, more power, because more rpm.

but you knew that.
Kingtal0n is offline   Reply With Quote