View Single Post
Old 06-14-2023, 01:20 PM   #23
mav1178
Zilvia.net Advertiser
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hacienda Heights, CA 91745
Posts: 1,524
Trader Rating: (19)
mav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfectionmav1178 is close to perfection
Quote:
Originally Posted by KA24DESOneThree View Post
I disagree that California would change its mind based on data. It has one of the biggest datasets at its fingertips already and hasn't made any positive decisions for classic and vintage car owners and, if anything, has made it harder to directly import a car since 2017.

Certain aspects of the law are in the best interest of air quality. Other aspects don't make sense- why should direct import cars 1968 through 1975 adhere to CA standards of the time when there's no testing done on those cars if purchased from within the States? It's such a small part of the market, why beat it up?
that's why I said "data is presented"

there's no lack of data. there is a lack of presenting this in a convincing manner to CARB for them to change their mind or provide exemptions moving forward.

us complaining about this just does the same thing from 20 years ago; getting nowhere. and the more people try to circumvent the existing smog system the worse it gets, as the data (to CARB) will show that plenty of people want to break the law.
__________________
Complete list of in stock items here:
https://bit.ly/3O5TOU5

Distributor for Nismo, ORC, and discontinued genuine Nissan parts.

Authorized dealer for Oakley -- PM me for the best prices!

[email protected]
mav1178 is offline   Reply With Quote