View Single Post
Old 03-18-2012, 10:14 PM   #14
usdm180sx
Post Whore!
 
usdm180sx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 562
Posts: 4,807
Trader Rating: (5)
usdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfectionusdm180sx is close to perfection
Send a message via AIM to usdm180sx Send a message via Yahoo to usdm180sx
Quote:
Originally Posted by codyace View Post
I'd say those results are probably due to the housing more than anything, and obviously safer timing charts from Enthalpy. there is no doubt more aggressive tuning can get it to light, but lets also not forget that torque onset is what chucks rods out of blocks too.

The difference in .64 housing cars to .86 is night and day...and I can see the ATP housing being similar.
So since the Special Turbine Housing T25-EWG-44 .72 A/R is roughly in between the .64 and .86 it should be a bit more responsive than the .86 and the stock exhaust manifold with an external wg will be more responsive than the Special Turbine Housing T25-EWG-44, correct?
__________________
-Norm!

usdm180sx is offline   Reply With Quote