2009-2010 NFL Season - Page 4 - Zilvia.net Forums | Nissan 240SX (Silvia) and Z (Fairlady) Car Forum

I LUV MY S13 · 09-22-2009, 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fliprayzin240sx

HAHAHAHA...thats like me saying Denver will make the playoffs...NOT GONNA HAPPEN.

actually possble..just gotta stay ahead in that division, which shouldnt be too hard chiefs and raiders, and the way things are going for the chargers

doogstein · 09-22-2009, 11:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I LUV MY S13

woh woh woh^^^...

forgot about the ravens or wahh??

AS OF RIGHT NOW da Jets DEF is the best in the league. They have given up a total of 10 points against 2 of the best offenses in football. They are the only D not to allow an offensive TD so far. Don;t get me wrong Baltimore's D is nasty but again AS OF RIGHT NOW da Jets have them beat in the D dept. Doesn't mean it's gona stay that way with TENN comin to town. We gota shut down Chris Johnson.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SimpleS14

Colts D was shitty and Jets have the best D?

Prove me wrong.... When ur DEF gives up 239 rushing yards and an average of almost 6 ypc then yea id say your DEF is pretty shitty.

I LUV MY S13 · 09-22-2009, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doogstein

AS OF RIGHT NOW da Jets DEF is the best in the league. They have given up a total of 10 points against 2 of the best offenses in football. They are the only D not to allow an offensive TD so far. Don;t get me wrong Baltimore's D is nasty but again AS OF RIGHT NOW da Jets have them beat in the D dept. Doesn't mean it's gona stay that way with TENN comin to town. We gota shut down Chris Johnson.

Prove me wrong.... When ur DEF gives up 239 rushing yards and an average of almost 6 ypc then yea id say your DEF is pretty shitty.

they've actually allowed 16 points buddy

they played the texans, a team that hasnt even been to the playoffs and arent that good overall. they played the pats who have a QB with no confidence right now and they didnt even get a sack. jets are a very good team but no where near the best, i'd put em at #4 in the afc.

and the colts D was obviously pretty good to keep miami from blowin them out of the game, colts offense only had 14:50 of total palying time..that tells u something

8Nismo9 · 09-23-2009, 12:05 AM

um chargers need to get rid of rivers

I LUV MY S13 · 09-23-2009, 12:07 AM

no, tomlinson

8Nismo9 · 09-23-2009, 12:11 AM

well him too,both need to go.Even though rivers has some good throws he messes up more than does good(side note sproles is awesome!)

I LUV MY S13 · 09-23-2009, 12:14 AM

nah rivers isnt that bad, they just need a running game again and gates to step up. look at wat they did 2-3 yrs ago wen tomlinson and gates were tha shit..a qb that does more wrong than right is tony homo

doogstein · 09-23-2009, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I LUV MY S13

they've actually allowed 16 points buddy

they played the texans, a team that hasnt even been to the playoffs and arent that good overall. they played the pats who have a QB with no confidence right now and they didnt even get a sack. jets are a very good team but no where near the best, i'd put em at #4 in the afc.

and the colts D was obviously pretty good to keep miami from blowin them out of the game, colts offense only had 14:50 of total palying time..that tells u something

I knew you would say 16 and you are incorrect. The 6 of the 7 points scored by Houston were because of the Sanchez interception. That had nothing to do with the Jets DEF. They only get docked 1 point for the PAT. Granted the Texans may not be an overall good team... but the offense is nasty. Look what they did to TENN this weekend. They torched em through the air. They need Slaton to pick it up on the ground. As far as the Pats go... although no sack was recorded in didnt need to be due to the fact that Brady couldn't get into his normal rhythm with all the ppressure. Thats why sometimes sack numbers are overrated. Granted it would have been nice to have a recorded sack on the Pats but all that needed to be done to fluster Brady and keep him form turning into his old self was constant looks and blitzes that he couldn't figure out.

I blame the Dolphins O for being unable to score against the Colts D. All they had to do was keep it on the ground and it would have been a totally different outcome. Not to mention that ridiculous last 3:10 of the game. What the time of possession tells me is that Miami's DEF is fuckin awful!!!!! Peyton Manning had all day to throw and holes opened up everywhere for the running game and he just didn't need alot of time to make things happen for the Colts. So I am not giving Miami's DEF any credit at all for the lack of possession time for the Colts.

doogstein · 09-23-2009, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8Nismo9

um chargers need to get rid of rivers

That definately not gona happen netime soon seeing as how he got a 6 yr/ $90 mil extension during the offseason.

doogstein · 09-23-2009, 01:08 PM

All you look at is the numbers at the end of the day but you don't take the time to figure out the analysis of the numbers. to get 27 points in 14:53 of possession is insanity. All you know how to do is read the stat sheet but you are unable to break down those stats and give proof to what you are saying.

*WakeBHR* · 09-23-2009, 09:08 PM

Im sorry niners D still gets my vote.
not that they are best in the league right now, but they are gonna be surprising alot of people around mid-end of the season.

colts D looked good because miami looked bad. and the colts watched fuckloads of tape obviously.

the jets lack experience in the secondary, trust me Im friends with one of their corners. but they looked good cuz once again the texans did bad

ESmorz · 09-23-2009, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8Nismo9

um chargers need to get rid of rivers

Chargers need to get rid of you.

*WakeBHR* · 09-23-2009, 10:13 PM

HAHA!

*Soup Nazi* · 09-24-2009, 06:32 AM

Colts front 4 were dominated by Miami, which does NOT have an explosive OFF. Teams are going to run the ball down the Colts throats all year.

Also Doogstein, It's only week 2 and youre already crowning the Jets the best. Wait till the season goes on. Jets started off pretty good last year too, and you saw what happened.

*fliprayzin240sx* · 09-24-2009, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I LUV MY S13

actually possble..just gotta stay ahead in that division, which shouldnt be too hard chiefs and raiders, and the way things are going for the chargers

No way in hell Denver will win their division...thats the only way they will make the playoff. Chargers are a better team all around, they will beat Oakland again, and consistently beat KC. They will beat Denver, thats the reason they will win the Division. Plus, looking at Denver's Schedule, yah the first 2 weeks was the cake walk...now the season of pain begins...

DEN @ OAK
DAL @ DEN
NE @ DEN
DEN @ SD
Week 7 Bye
DEN @ BAL
PIT @ DEN
DEN @ WAS
SD @ DEN
NYG @ DEN
DEN @ KC
DEN @ IND
OAK @ DEN
DEN @ PHI
KC @ DEN

doogstein · 09-24-2009, 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Soup Nazi

Also Doogstein, It's only week 2 and youre already crowning the Jets the best. Wait till the season goes on. Jets started off pretty good last year too, and you saw what happened.

Again I must reiterate the AS OF RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!! I put that there to point out that AS OF RIGHT NOW Jets DEF is numero uno. But again remember it's AS OF RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!

DrftSLowHomIe!! · 09-24-2009, 01:12 PM

For the denver fanz u can put a L on ur schedule for week 10.

RbPowered240z · 09-24-2009, 04:23 PM

Greenbay packers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I LUV MY S13 · 09-24-2009, 04:28 PM

damn LA needs a team already

RedEvilRPS13 · 09-24-2009, 08:01 PM

ok so last weekend 2 of my teams i watch won, NO and CIN.

The pats need to get their shit together, ASAP.

The Bucs? Ugh. I dont know wtf they were thinking firing everyone in the offseason, because it hasnt seemed to help...AT ALL.

*WakeBHR* · 09-25-2009, 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I LUV MY S13

damn LA needs a team already

HAHA me and my dad were just talking about that.
he said supposedly they may be getting one soon, I guess too many people have the same sentiments.

Im really looking forward to seeing the Niners go up against Adrian Peterson and the Viks tomorrow. Im thinking since the D is used to going up against Gore who has a similar running style, so if they can manage to limit AP in any way then Im pretty sure favre is good for at least one pick 6.

DrftSLowHomIe!! · 09-25-2009, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedEvilRPS13

ok so last weekend 2 of my teams i watch won, NO and CIN.

The pats need to get their shit together, ASAP.

The Bucs? Ugh. I dont know wtf they were thinking firing everyone in the offseason, because it hasnt seemed to help...AT ALL.

Why so many teams?? stick to one.

*SimpleS14* · 09-25-2009, 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I LUV MY S13

damn LA needs a team already

Cali already has three NFL teams, do you really think another one is necessary?

I'm aware that Cali has four NBA teams....

*WakeBHR* · 09-25-2009, 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SimpleS14

Cali already has three NFL teams, do you really think another one is necessary?

I'm aware that Cali has four NBA teams....

Has nothing to do with how many teams are in the state, LA needs a team.

I LUV MY S13 · 09-25-2009, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SimpleS14

Cali already has three NFL teams, do you really think another one is necessary?

I'm aware that Cali has four NBA teams....

c'mon now, this los angeles..second biggest city in the country(i think) and we dont have a football team???

they've been saying LA is working on getting one for the last 3 yrs but i havent heard of anything official

*Daniel.* · 09-25-2009, 07:23 PM

Honest Question- If LA were to get a team, where would it come from? Would one of the existing teams move to LA, or would the entire NFL have to be reorganized? (or maybe just one of the divisions, and not the entire NFL.)

*SimpleS14* · 09-25-2009, 08:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by I LUV MY S13

c'mon now, this los angeles..second biggest city in the country(i think) and we dont have a football team???

they've been saying LA is working on getting one for the last 3 yrs but i havent heard of anything official

Maybe the Raiders will move back to LA

j/k

I second Daniel's question, I'm curious about that too.

SR_Vlurs · 09-25-2009, 08:01 PM

Giants are the best team in the NFL =)
and the best D =)

doogstein · 09-25-2009, 08:01 PM

LA has had teams in the past and they didn't work out. The Rams and Raiders were both LA teams before moving to St. Louis and Oakland. I'm sure there has to be a good reason why there is no team in LA right now. I don't see it happening anytime soon either esp with the projected lockout of 2011.

*WakeBHR* · 09-26-2009, 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doogstein

LA has had teams in the past and they didn't work out. The Rams and Raiders were both LA teams before moving to St. Louis and Oakland. I'm sure there has to be a good reason why there is no team in LA right now. I don't see it happening anytime soon either esp with the projected lockout of 2011.

HAHA kids.... what can you do?
First of all the raiders started in Oakland and then moved to LA in 82 and back in 95.
Second the rams started in Cleveland and moved to LA in 1947 and then to STL in 95 also.

LA needs a team because they are one of the biggest metropolitan areas in the united states, if not the biggest outside the tri-state area sprawl-wise. The reason they dont have one is that there isnt any place for a team, if a team was to start in La they would need all new facilities as Im sure USC has laid pretty solid claim to the coliseum at this point.
The other issue is whether or not the NFL is ready for 2 more expansion teams. The next LA team would have to be an expansion team because I dont really forsee any teams moving without the city offering some serious compensation (more than said team gets already) and probably a whole new stadium. Another problem with the expansion team thing is that for there to be 1 new team there has to be 2 new teams (AFC-NFC obviously) and I dont know of anywhere else thats thinking of or can afford to start a team.

Thats it in a nutshell,
Im sure if you hear about someone trying to expand or move, LA is going to be hot on their tail

09-23-2009, 12:07 AM	#95
I LUV MY S13 Zilvia FREAK! Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: NORWALK..56duece Age: 20 Posts: 1,443 Trader Rating: (5)	no, tomlinson __________________ FYC bitches

09-23-2009, 12:14 AM	#97
I LUV MY S13 Zilvia FREAK! Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: NORWALK..56duece Age: 20 Posts: 1,443 Trader Rating: (5)	nah rivers isnt that bad, they just need a running game again and gates to step up. look at wat they did 2-3 yrs ago wen tomlinson and gates were tha shit..a qb that does more wrong than right is tony homo __________________ FYC bitches

09-24-2009, 06:32 AM	#104
Soup Nazi Ki Ki Ki Ma Ma Ma Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: S.Jeerzy Age: 27 Posts: 533 Trader Rating: (5) Rides Gallery: Soup Nazi	Colts front 4 were dominated by Miami, which does NOT have an explosive OFF. Teams are going to run the ball down the Colts throats all year. Also Doogstein, It's only week 2 and youre already crowning the Jets the best. Wait till the season goes on. Jets started off pretty good last year too, and you saw what happened. __________________ Ever bought anything from me? Leave a review http://www.zilvia.net/f/showthread.php?t=200877 Last edited by Soup Nazi; 09-24-2009 at 07:05 AM.

09-24-2009, 01:12 PM	#107
DrftSLowHomIe!! Zilvia Junkie Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Long Beach Age: 23 Posts: 494 Trader Rating: (1)	For the denver fanz u can put a L on ur schedule for week 10. __________________

09-24-2009, 04:28 PM	#109
I LUV MY S13 Zilvia FREAK! Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: NORWALK..56duece Age: 20 Posts: 1,443 Trader Rating: (5)	damn LA needs a team already __________________ FYC bitches

09-23-2009, 12:05 AM	#94
8Nismo9 Zilvia Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: San Diego,California Posts: 226 Trader Rating: (4)	um chargers need to get rid of rivers

09-23-2009, 12:11 AM	#96
8Nismo9 Zilvia Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: San Diego,California Posts: 226 Trader Rating: (4)	well him too,both need to go.Even though rivers has some good throws he messes up more than does good(side note sproles is awesome!)

09-23-2009, 01:08 PM	#100
doogstein Leaky Injector Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Coral Springs, FL Age: 23 Posts: 128 Trader Rating: (0)	All you look at is the numbers at the end of the day but you don't take the time to figure out the analysis of the numbers. to get 27 points in 14:53 of possession is insanity. All you know how to do is read the stat sheet but you are unable to break down those stats and give proof to what you are saying.

09-24-2009, 04:23 PM	#108
RbPowered240z Zilvia Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: los angeles Posts: 233 Trader Rating: (1)	Greenbay packers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

09-25-2009, 07:23 PM	#116
Daniel. Pie Eater Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: San Jose, CA Age: 24 Posts: 2,439 Trader Rating: (0) Rides Gallery: Daniel.	Honest Question- If LA were to get a team, where would it come from? Would one of the existing teams move to LA, or would the entire NFL have to be reorganized? (or maybe just one of the divisions, and not the entire NFL.) __________________

09-25-2009, 08:01 PM	#118
SR_Vlurs Zilvia Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: in the worse place in the world ..... Posts: 228 Trader Rating: (2)	Giants are the best team in the NFL =) and the best D =) __________________ ¿$phinx?

09-25-2009, 08:01 PM	#119
doogstein Leaky Injector Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Coral Springs, FL Age: 23 Posts: 128 Trader Rating: (0)	LA has had teams in the past and they didn't work out. The Rams and Raiders were both LA teams before moving to St. Louis and Oakland. I'm sure there has to be a good reason why there is no team in LA right now. I don't see it happening anytime soon either esp with the projected lockout of 2011.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode